For the series "When a journalist reports a false news", the heading Repubblica.it netmonitor (to which this blog is probably the most visitors) is today publishing a false Notz recorded on a blog.
The news says that Blank / zero count for the award of the majority and (do not know how) encourage those who take the most 'votes. Abstentions, however, would not have this effect.
For ennessima time: this is 'a COLOSSAL BALE, in my opinion instrumentally orchestrated to reassure those who feared that voting can not' promote Berlusconi. In fact, it is said, look, if anything marks card / white favors those who take the most 'votes, rather than abstain if not. So do not worry. Eh, no. It is not 'so'.
First 'cause the majority of the premium (regional and national level for the Senate to the House) and' attributed to those who take even one more vote, 'No matter how many blank ballots / null and regardless of the number of people and not' even went to the bench.
Second, and 'absolutely true that both behaviors (void cards / white or failure) and those who favor' advantage. The only way to ensure that Berlusconi does not win the elections and 'vote for lists that can realistically take more' ratings of its lists at the national level (per room) or regional (for the Senate, although the discussion here can 'be more' complicated in some regions where the PD and the PDL are certainly winning, but trlascio details on which both you and 'written elsewhere).
So, I still think that abstention is a mistake for the reasons I explained here . I think it's fair to change sostenre efforts carried out by Walter Veltroni in Italy for the first time a European-style government argued in a single homogeneous parliamentary group. I have not only voted against, I did not vote for the "least worst" but for "more 'better'. Walter Veltroni.
Plus' I add. No, dear abstentions, Do not get your soul in peace. By not voting favored Berlusconi. If what you and 'indifferent vabbe. But not raccontiamoci bales.
0 comments:
Post a Comment