The Socialist Party has decided to run alone in these elections, rejecting the offer (they'll say, taxation) to enter the lists of Veltroni's PD and then form a single group after the elections. This, they say, because it 's important to be present with its own symbol. This view is respectable, but not exactly the same one that had in past elections when you are first presented with signs and Dini (1996), then with the Greens in the Sunflower (2001), then in The Olive Tree with DS, Margherita and Republicans (2004) and finally with radicals in the Rosa nel Pugno (2006). In none of these competitions have submitted their election symbol.
The election campaign and 'understandably been set up to attract the attention of some voters "pissed off" and the party Boselli played much on affinity' with Zapatero, English (at least online), arriving to enlist (jokes of secularism ') Jesus' as the first Socialist ( video ). Now, Zapatero and 'spoke with a message ( video ) support that Veltroni and 'pretty clear (as are those of the other leaders of European Socialists and others). On the part of Jesus', well, I do not expect corrections in the near future.
Flying the misguided attempt to save the soldier Mastella, a few days before the vote said that Boselli and 'ready to make common cause with the Left Rainbow even before the vote because' unites them the land of secularism '. The journalist who argues that in economic terms there are profound differences between him and Bertinotti, Boselli responds:
"But voters are mature enough to understand that a common front on
secularism in Parliament is indeed necessary. "
I understand that there is a certain affinity 'between the positions of the Socialists and the Democratic Party on economic matters. It can' be that there are some differences on the ground of secularism ', I suppose that you sum up with Boselli name Binetti. And then, if these voters socialists, are mature enough to understand an agreement with Bertinotti in the name of secularism, 'cause a few weeks ago were not mature enough to understand that the Socialists may participate in the construction of a reformist party (1) supported by all leaders of European Socialists (2) in which there is' a great and natural proximity to the economic circumstances, and (3) where you have to face each other on land rights civilians with Binetti, of course, and then by Bonino, Veronesi and many lay people who come from different paths of the Italian left? Instead, the reasoning seems to be Boselli, and 'more' nice to be in an Italy ruled by a right-wing government with a divided opposition on everything, but united by Secularism '.
I'm more 'optimistic Boselli. I think voters understand that socialists in the game and 'the government of the country. In the name of secularism, 'you can' assign the right of the law on assisted procreation. Or you can 'to support a government that will' economic policies that also like the Socialists, while we will try on ethical issues' confronting the synthesis as in all the major reformist parties in Europe.
And if, thanks to the votes of the Socialists for the PD, we will have a majority with a minority PD PDL and SA, then we will have a term with one of the most 'progressive large attendance we have ever seen in Italy. And I get the feeling that the Party of European Socialists do not regret it '.
There 's only one way in which the Binetti can' be decisive for the future of Italy. In deciding to vote on it for more 'weight of one or Bonino Veronesi (for example), by voting for the purity and secular giving away 5 more years of Berlusconi's Italy. In economics and civil rights.
0 comments:
Post a Comment